Which browser is better? Which is better Google Chrome or Apple Safari? Which is better safari or chrome
Any person using personal computer, has its own browser, which it uses most often. Internet browsers Nowadays there are quite a lot, and it can be simply impossible to choose just one based on certain characteristics. Therefore, it is better to choose the one that you like specifically.
There are often cases when users prefer the browser that the computer itself offers, that is, the one installed by default. The most popular dilemma of owners MacOS or MacBook is the choice: Safari or Chrome. Below we will try to explain in an accessible and understandable way why this or that browser is worthy of being used as the main one.
Three reasons to use Chrome for OS X
In the last year, thanks to a competent development strategy, the Internet browser GoogleChrome became the main one on 40% of all computers in the world, surpassing Edge And InternetExplorer. Therefore, we can say that it is really very convenient, productive and functional, because so many users cannot simply choose it for nothing. Obviously, there are very important and valuable advantages. We will talk about them below.
High performance
The vast majority of computer owners OSX they will assure you that Chrome is indeed noticeably faster than the one installed “by default” Safari. We tested this in practice and, I must say, we were surprised, this is true. I had to look for a logical explanation for this. In fact, it turned out that Chrome uses more computer CPU resources than other browsers - this is the reason for its high performance. The only negative point about this is that with intensive use of the processor, the discharge occurs quite quickly battery. However, if you use a computer connected to the mains, or a stationary iMac, this is not a problem.
Highest level of usability
A noticeable difference in user interface becomes immediately clear if, for example, you go from Chrome on Safari. The bookmarks bar in the Google browser offers the user interactive, convenient site icons, and the tabs are also located more intuitively. But here, most likely, the whole point is a habit that disappears over time in a person.
Wide variety of extensions
The fact that you can install a huge variety of different extensions in Google’s browser is an indisputable fact. Every more or less knowledgeable user knows that Chrome is famous for its unique plugins, which simply have no equal. Unlike the same Edge and Opera, dozens of plugins and applications are developed daily on Chrome to make working with the browser even more comfortable. Even the wide customization capabilities in Safari are, for objective reasons, not competitors to Google extensions.
Three reasons to use Safari
Taking into account all the compliments addressed to Chrome, we should not forget about the native one for the operating system browserSafari. The main thing where I would like to start listing the advantages of the Apple browser is that it fits perfectly into the design of OS X. In contrast, Chrome looks like a “cut off chunk.”
What is native is always better
We all know that Apple is a company that is distinguished from others by its attention to detail and unique design. Internet- Safari browser also designed to fit perfectly into the overall lines of coherence and elegance. In addition, OS X has its own special things that simply cannot be replicated by other browsers and on other operating systems. Based on this, the main advantage of Safari compared to Chrome is that it is already part of the native Apple ecosystem, while “chrome” is just independent program. At the same time, the native Internet browser from Cupertino provides ample opportunities for use not only in terms of surfing the World Wide Web, but also cloud serviceiCloud.
Unique built-in features
At first glance, you can see that Safari is a rather primitive browser. In reality, this is far from the case. Let's start with the fact that there is simply no need to install additional extensions on it. Sending notifications directly from websites is a popular feature nowadays, implemented in a special push notification module OS X. This allows the user to always be aware of the most important events on third-party resources, and the function itself works like push in mobile devices.
One more no less interesting feature- support AirPlay, which makes it possible to broadcast what is happening in the browser directly to the TV screen if you have a set-top box AppleTV. One cannot fail to note the Reader mode, with which a person can read texts and articles without advertising, even if it is present on a particular site. And finally, the “Responsive Design” function can adjust appearance web pages for any screen size.
Saves battery consumption and reduces CPU load
Another undeniable advantage Safari before Chrome– significantly lower energy consumption. This fact is explained by more economical consumption of CPU resources. In practice, it turned out that the average time Mac work with Safari enabled is an hour less than with Chrome.
If you do not “stress” the processor with excessive loads, it will not overheat and will last you much longer than usual. In addition, heating contributes to increased work of the cooling system and, consequently, loud noise, which can also be considered a negative factor even by the most patient person.
The site’s laboratory has been conducting tests for several years now. software for Android devices, and now we have decided to expand our horizons. Now on our resource you can find reviews of applications for iOS devices.
And we’ll start by looking at those programs in which we get stuck for hours, without which a smartphone would not be a full-fledged gadget that provides direct access to the Internet and connection to the virtual world.
First of all we will look at standard application Apple Safari, with which we compare those already familiar to us Google Chrome And Mozilla Firefox. Maybe the stock iPhone browser is so good and perfect that its competitors are simply not needed?
The following device was used as test equipment:
- Smartphone Apple iPhone 6 (iOS 10.3.2 installed).
Apple Safari
Acquaintance
There are rumors that all Apple products are immediately ready for use, as they say, “out of the box”, they do not need to be modified, they are ideal... It sounds optimistic, but what if? Let's start clarifying this fact with mobile version Safari browser.
Getting started
Immediately after purchasing and activating your Apple mobile device, you may notice an unusual compass icon on its screen. It would seem, what is the connection here? In my opinion, this is how the developers show that their application will help you find any information on the network, as if using a compass. Hope.
The main menu of the Safari browser is represented by icons with our favorite bookmarks. Regardless of whether you have a regular iPhone or the Plus version, there will always be four icons in width, but either five or six in height. For an iPhone with a “classic” diagonal, the layout of the elements is quite good, but in the “large” version of the smartphone the display size is poorly used.
There is a search bar docked at the top of the screen. Okay at least search engine we are allowed to choose, and I easily installed Yandex, since I mostly use it.
As for the sites themselves and their layout, everything is ordinary here. In most cases, the mobile version will load by default, which, again, is usually well optimized for the iPhone. True, the text does not adapt to the device’s screen, so reading is sometimes not very convenient.
Actually, this is all that is available to the user in the browser of one of the most advanced devices in the world. model range Apple.
To switch between pages, an additional menu is used; the tabs in it are arranged in a very unusual way, which is what fascinates. Pay attention to the screenshots.
By the way, from this section you can go to “ Private mode", only here it is called "Private Access". If someone asks for a smartphone to go online, then I always open this mode, especially if I don’t want to close dozens of my tabs.
The difference between normal mode and it’s almost impossible to consider it privately. Perhaps Apple could somehow integrate Touch ID here for secure access to bookmarks, a resource, or as a password for a specific folder.
I won’t say much about the history and bookmarks, because there’s nothing interesting there. All bookmarks are stored on the device and in cloud storage, are constantly synchronized with all our Apple gadgets. You can create folders in the bookmarks section. I remember that this feature was not available on the iPhone 3G.
Settings
If Google's applications still have at least some parameters, then most Apple applications do not even have such a section, and the Safari browser is no exception.
Testing
All Apple apps work as smoothly, clearly and stably as possible, you will not see messages in them “the application was closed by error...”, “the program stopped responding and was closed...” and so on. This is already a definite success compared to Android, just like that and no other way.
No matter what actions you do in the Safari browser, no matter how many tabs you have open, your smartphone will perform your actions as smoothly as possible. Even tabs practically do not reload, especially if you have an iPhone 6s or newer, with a lot of RAM. You can easily say that this browser works great.
About support Adobe Flash this browser has never known and will never know.
As for online browser tests, Safari performs quite well here.
Conclusions
Apple Safari is an excellent browser for the undemanding user. It works well and will not make you bored while waiting for this or that page to load, does not slow down, does not contain bugs, and almost always works smoothly. In principle, in terms of stability and performance, there are no complaints about it.
There's been a lot of talk about web browsers in the last few days. They wrote that Google is ready to pay Mozilla a billion dollars over the next three years in order to guarantee its search engine the status of a system that is used “by default.” The reason is that Google is now competing with Firefox with its Chrome. What about Safari what are the prospects and ways further development this popular browser? Popular blogger MG Siegler talks about this.
Remember Safari?
It should be noted that Chrome managed to rise from 0% of the market in August 2008 to as much as 25% in November 2011. Apple's web browser is currently used by 5% to 8% of owners various devices. Safari's growth slowed in late 2008 and early 2009, but did not stop. Its popularity continues to grow - of course, not at the same pace as the Google browser.
Considering that both browsers are powered by WebKit, an engine "born" at Apple, the question arises: why hasn't Safari taken off instead of Chrome and is not one of the most popular browsers?
The answer may generally be simple - because most people still use Windows. Microsoft remains dominant despite Mac sales breaking records quarter after quarter. But despite the fact that the Safari browser is usually associated with Mac (since it is built into OS X), it can be used by owners of devices running Windows control, and much longer than Chrome.
Safari for Windows launched in beta in June 2007. This was followed by a wide release in March 2008. The presentation of Chrome took place in September of the same year, initially only in the Windows version. And Google only had one year to overtake Safari and take a significant market share.
If it's not Windows, then what is it? What allowed Chrome to grow?
Another reason most often cited is speed. Numerous tests show that Chrome has become the most fast browser both in page rendering speed and JavaScript performance.
It’s worth remembering here that when they announced the release of Safari for Windows, they showed the results of similar tests that showed the speed superiority of Safari on Mac and PC (don’t forget that Chrome didn’t exist then). If it was all about speed, why didn't Safari launch in June 2007 like Chrome did in September 2008?
On the other hand, many users have complained over the past few years that Safari for Windows is a disappointment. If you do not take into account test results, but opinions ordinary users, then it is placed between Firefox and Internet Explorer by level of practical performance (that is, by the feeling of speed during use). But Apple continues to make Safari available on both platforms, and version 5.1 is no exception.
Some blame Google's growth as a manufacturer for Chrome's growth. The fact is that Google does not particularly promote its browser, except that there is a link to download it on the Google.com website. And it's hard to see this as an advantage over IE or Safari, which are built into Windows and OS X, respectively. To get Chrome at your disposal, the user needs to specifically download it, and, as practice shows, for most this is not a difficulty or a reason to use another browser. It's also safe to assume that most people use IE or Safari simply because they were the default browsers they received when they bought their computers.
The good thing about Safari was that it was the default for iTunes users, and for some time this gave it an advantage over Windows browsers. But it seems that most people who downloaded it simply didn't use it.
Perhaps the benefits of Chrome are extensions? Perhaps, but Safari has also had them since mid-2010. Of course, there are more of them in Chrome and they are more convenient to use, but for sure - if it were only them, the developers would get into the game and pay more attention to them. In addition, extensions appeared in Firefox long before Chrome and Safari, but they did not help the browser become a leader; it is still inferior in popularity to Chrome.
With the launch of OS X Lion, it looked like Safari might be heading into a renaissance. The default settings have changed, third-party software like Chrome has received restrictions. Safari also has new features - improved multi-touch support and Reading List (for synchronization between iOS and OS X Lion), which competitors did not have. But several months of data showed that Safari's growth remained sluggish, supported by quantitative growth in Mac sales.
Given the growth in the mobile industry, one would expect that the increase in Safari mobile users would help increase the number of Safari users on laptops and desktop systems. But the numbers still show very slow growth for the Apple browser. Meanwhile, Chrome, which isn't part of Android (maybe not yet, but still definitely isn't) is rapidly gaining traction without the help of the mobile industry.
According to MG Siegler, he himself uses Chrome. He tried several times to switch to Safari as his main browser (most recently with the release of the OS X Lion update), but eventually returned to Chrome. Purely for reasons of performance and practical convenience. For example, Safari is inferior to Chrome when it comes to handling 10 or more open tabs, and not only in this regard.
MG Siegler also says he can't live without Omnibox, the address bar at the top of every open tab that Chrome offers. He also often takes advantage of the ability to collapse tabs and place them on the left side of the screen, separate from the general row of open websites.
It's been almost 9 years since Steve Jobs first officially talked about Safari at a Macworld event in 2003. The browser has been constantly improving since then and maintains its share of users, but compared to Chrome it is growing much slower (during this time Safari managed to get more than half as many users as Chrome).
Of course, the situation can still change quickly if devices iPad type will replace most consumer computers. If we talk only about mobile devices, then there is no doubt about the superiority of Safari over Google, since Google has not yet done mobile version your browser. And that makes the opposite situation in the traditional PC space even stranger.
In general, MG Siegler was not able to finally figure it out. Perhaps it's all about the priorities of Apple itself, which is developing App Store gives priority, offering to use native products rather than looking for analogues on the Internet. But, again, the development of mobile Safari rejects this assumption. Most likely, the problem is in Google Chrome itself, which turned out to be a really good product. Success often comes with good products.
Recently I asked myself the question: what is better and more convenient to use – the Safari browser or Google Chrome? I outlined my thoughts on this matter in this article.
Most PC users running , enjoy popular at the moment browser from Google - Chrome. Why did he become so popular? The answer is very simple - all because of its simplicity, speed and small gluttony of RAM memory. This is all good, of course, but what if you look for more browsers, because there will probably be competition for it. And as for me, the Safari browser from Cupertino can be considered a competitor to Chrome.
First, let's look at the pros and cons of both browsers.
Let's start with. So, they made their browser almost perfect - it opens pages quickly, is very easy to use and, most importantly, uses little RAM, and on top of all this, it can also synchronize with Google account, which by the way is very convenient. Of course, there are also disadvantages, for example, you cannot independently expose sites to Top sites; they are displayed in some incomprehensible way. This seems to be where all the disadvantages end.
So how can the Safari browser compare to Chrome? Of course, you will be surprised, but this is a design and a few features that Chrome does not have. Let's start with the design; as always, it is made in the spirit of Apple; there's not even anything to talk about, but we can only emphasize how beautiful the Top sites and history look. Just like in Chrome, you can install plugins, for example Gmail, which is very convenient if you use this service email. Also, a small feature of the Safari browser is changing the interface - you can change the interface, this is sometimes really convenient.
Also, a very big advantage that the Safari browser has is the smoothing of fonts, the text is really pleasant to read. Yes, it’s possible that if you use Chrome on Mac OS x, where the fonts are smoothed by the OS itself, you won’t notice the difference, but on Windows it’s very noticeable. To be honest, there are a lot of disadvantages in Safari, firstly, sometimes WebKit crashes, well, this happened to me personally, I don’t know about other users. There is no spell check, that is, it is there, just not in Russian. Well, such useful things as synchronizing bookmarks and settings.
Well, in general, I would choose the Safari browser, after all, it somehow attracts me more on Windows, but alas, Apple does not release updates very often compared to versions for OS x.
The conclusion is this: if the speed and power of the browser are important to you, then I advise you Google Chrome. Well, if you prefer a Cupertino-style design and a few features, then this 100% should be the Safari browser.
Browser choice is a matter of habit, but there are a number of factors in Safari's favor that you should consider, especially when working in an OS X environment.
Heated debates about which browser is the best will never subside. Almost every user considers it his duty to defend the honor of the program that he uses every day. Safari, Chrome, Firefox, Opera and many other solutions are available to OS X users today, but the choice is often made between the listed browsers.
Opera- a clear outsider. The browser, popular in the post-Soviet space, quickly lost its audience and is now supported solely by the enthusiasm of the developers, as well as a small part of loyal users. The patient is still alive, although he has been feeding through a tube for a long time.
An interesting situation is developing with Firefox. Browser positions are no longer what they used to be. The decline of the “fire fox” coincided amazingly precisely with the rise of Chrome. It is Google's browser that is currently the most popular alternative solution for both Windows users, and for OS X devotees. For some reason, it seems that in a direct comparison, Internet Explorer is more often replaced by a third-party browser than Safari, but these are details.
So, competition between Safari and Chrome within OS X it turns out to be quite serious. Both sides have strong arguments for supporting one browser or another. Google's solution really has a lot to offer strengths, as, indeed, Safari. Both programs are based on the engine WebKit, only the implementation is different.
By and large, Chrome fits perfectly into the ecosystem of Google devices, although at the same time Mac computer and it looks a little strange in it. Of course, Safari has much deeper and more thoughtful integration not only within OS X, but also with mobile devices based on iOS. No third-party solution can boast of such connections and capabilities. Apple's policy is already in effect here.
On the other side of the scale Google services, with which Chrome works just perfectly. Availability of the same name mobile browser on your smartphone or tablet can also be interpreted as an argument in favor of Chrome. As you can see, a lot depends on personal preferences, habits and the services used on the Internet. Much, but not all.
There is at least several objective shortcomings in Chrome for OS X, which is not worth putting up with.
Firstly, Google's browser is frankly carelessly consumes battery power your MacBook. These are not empty words: there are many tests in which an Apple computer lasts noticeably longer when using Safari, while Chrome does not help battery life much. It is possible that you are ready to sacrifice an hour or two for the sake of a familiar browser, but this is not the only drawback.
I'm not a big fan of synthetic tests. I believe that visual impressions are much more important when choosing a browser. Therefore, according to my observations, within OS X Safari hardly leaves a chance for competitors. Web pages will open quickly in both cases - it all depends on the speed of the Internet. The point is different. Using Safari and Chrome alternately, it's easy to notice how smoothly Apple's browser works. It works ideally in operating system for which it was created. Chrome is also fast, but it is perceived differently, not so, the browser lacks the gloss of proprietary OS X applications. In general, synthetic tests that are easy to find on the Internet will also confirm the superiority of Safari in many cases, so the visual assessment is in this case didn't disappoint.
Safari's next advantage can also be debated, but Apple's browser is already out of the box offers users more options. Here you can also broadcast links from social networks, and the pending reading list, and the excellent Top Sites start screen, and Reader mode. But you can add extensions here. In other words, Safari, launched for the first time, is extremely user-friendly.
The same can't be said for Chrome. When I first launched this browser on Windows, I was a little shocked. It was supposed to replace Opera, but its emptiness and fundamental principle of “do it yourself with extensions” took a lot of time to get used to and find suitable plugins. Bookmarks in this browser- a real nightmare. The transition to Safari a couple of years later was much smoother. Well, it should be noted that without account Google is very uncomfortable using Chrome.
Here we could touch on the topic of privacy and discuss where Google sends and how it uses our data received from the browser, but we will not do this. You understand everything as well as I do and probably have your own opinion about the current state of affairs. Therefore, notice how smooth page scrolling is in Safari, just perfection! Jerky scrolling in Chrome will not cause such delight.
We have already mentioned increased energy consumption, so we should also mention Chrome’s increased appetite for RAM. There’s simply nothing to add here: whether in Windows or OS X, Google’s browser consumes many valuable megabytes of RAM. Safari is much more economical in this regard, although it also had RAM leaks that caused problems. MacBook Air. Updates solved the problem.
After I stopped using Windows, I stopped using and Chrome browser. Not right away, the transition to Safari was also gradual, but I don’t want to go back at all. Living in an ecosystem Apple devices there is absolutely no need for Chrome with its eternal disdain for the OS X platform. Apple may not be in a hurry to develop Safari at the same high pace that competitors have taken with their browsers, but the solution from Cupertino fits too organically into the system for him to look for alternatives, and the obvious disadvantages of the same Chrome make the choice almost unconditional.
In the comments, I propose to conduct an objective dialogue, supported by arguments and real facts, and not a fan debate. Take what you read above as a personal opinion, and not the ultimate truth.
